The Obama Administration released the long anticipated Open Government Directive on Tuesday. It lays out some ambitious steps for executive departments and agencies to take over the relatively near-term to be more transparent, participatory, and accountable, such as:
Within 45 days, each agency shall identify and publish online in an open format at least three high-value data sets and register those data sets via Data.gov
Within 60 days, each agency shall create an Open Government web page, and respond to public input received via that page
Within 120 days, each agency shall develop and publish an Open Government Plan that will describe how it will improve transparency and integrate public participation and collaboration into its activities
Not sure how to get started? We can help. We've worked for many years helping organizations develop effective approaches to be more transparent and accountable online. We can help you develop and document a credible Open Government Plan that meets OMBs objectives and at the same time aligns with your organizational realities and challenges. Opening your organization up to invite and respond to public input can be scary. It helps to have well crafted plan that is rolled out smoothly. For most organizations, there will be some easy wins that you can already take credit for or accomplish quickly, along with some more challenging actions to be taken over the longer term.
Have a plan for your data. To meet the requirements for publishing open data, we can help you identify and prioritize candidate data sets that might be well-suited to publishing online and to Data.gov. We can help you understand what formats are most appropriate for the data and put in place a communications strategy to accompany its release.
Kudos to the administration for pushing the envelope on open government. It's going to be an exciting several months to watch everything unfold.
The folks at IOM are looking to hire a Manager of Web Communications, to serve as the primary point of contact for the IOM’s interactive activities as well as the producer and editor of the IOM’s website. "It is a critical role in this 175-person organization focused on improving health." More info here.
We have described previously on this blog how Forum One approaches social media in general, as well as our experience with SlideShare and Scribd. In this post, we'll discuss the current glamour child of social media, Twitter.
Twitter is impossible to ignore. It has been embraced by celebrities (Britney Spears, Oprah), adopted by journalists (Anderson Cooper, Nicholas Kristof) and appropriated by politicians (Nancy Pelosi, Sarah Palin). More importantly, it has grown quickly (from 5 million to 50 million users this year) and is becoming a fixture with the influential organizations and individuals with whom we work.
In response to Twitter's influence, we have launched five company Twitter feeds, @ForumOne, @OCReport, @DataMasher, @Legistalker, and @ProjectSpaces (a combined feed is here). These feeds currently have a total of about 15,000 followers, up from 4,000 in August. A number of staff also have personal accounts they manage (on their own time) which include a lot of company re-tweets and information and represent another 15,000 or so followers.
Here is our approach to this growing network:
Goals: As with all social media, we need to be clear about our goals, and whether Twitter supports them or not. In shorthand, our goals are 1) to sell more consulting services and products; 2) strengthen our ties with existing clients; 3) learn about social media to support our consulting; and 4) increase our general name awareness.
Current Priorities: In order to improve our effectiveness, we've focused on a number of areas. We wrote an internal guidelines document structuring our approach to Twitter. We've made a concerted effort to increase our tweeting and follower counts of relevant individuals. We've tried to improve the quality of our content (importance, grammar, format) as well as mentions when appropriate of "Forum One" (as opposed to "the company" or "F1", which we say internally). We've increased re-tweets across accounts when useful, and have decided on metrics of success which we review every other month.
Staffing: We have five staff responsible for most of our account management who all together spend about 15 staff hours per week on Twitter (tweeting, managing followers and answering direct messages). We currently use HootSuite which offers many advantages, but is not strong for joint account management. We've explored CoTweet and other platforms but haven't liked them enough to move.
Results to Date: Last month, across our five accounts, we had 317 tweets. Our "circulation" (tweets x followers) was 1.26 million, with about 5,000 "click-throughs" (which track only URLs shortened via HootSuite -- about one-third of total tweets). This gives us a click-through rate of around 16.7% (clicks divided by total all followers of our five accounts plus staff accounts) -- which is better than other Twitter click-through reports we've seen.
We feel like we've made good progress on all of the "current priorities" listed above. With respect to meeting our principal goals, we have little question that we've strengthened our ties to clients, learned about social media, and raised our company profile. We aren't yet sure about our first (and most important) goal of increasing consulting services or product sales directly attributable to Twitter. Connecting the dots from "marketing" to "sales" is always difficult. We have anecdotal information which is encouraging, but nothing unambiguous.
So on balance, we've invested a fair amount into Twitter, it is performing well in terms of growth and reach, and it clearly provides value towards goals we care about. The jury is still out whether it is crucial to driving our company marketing and growth efforts overall. We'll watch this issue closely over the next few months.
How is Twitter supporting your goals? What sort of performance are you seeing? Let us know in the comments.
Jim Cashel is Chairman at Forum One. Feel free to follow him on Twitter at @Cashel or write him at Cashel@ForumOne.com.
We're seeing exciting trends in governments making data more available — and valuable — for the public. Whether on crime, education, or the environment, governments are putting more data on the web. And they're doing it in ways that allow people to build web applications on top of the data.
By now, most folks in the web development and Gov 2.0 communities (and readers of this blog) have heard about the federal government's Data.gov initiative (and the winner of a certain Apps for America competition using these data sets). But local and state governments are also setting their data free. Here are a few examples:
MassDOT's Developers Page: The Massachusetts Department of Transportation hosted a competition for users to create useful applications and visualizations of the state's transportation data. The submissions included several compelling mobile apps. The two top submissions received one-year of free travel on the MBTA, in addition to recognition at the MassDOT Developers Conference.
DataSF: A clearinghouse of over 100 machine-readable government data sets from a range of city departments, including Police, Public Works, and the Municipal Transportation Agency. Independent programmers have used the data to develop a range of innovative mashups an mobile apps, which the city lists in its App Showcase.
What are your favorite examples of government data applications and mashups? Tell us in the comments.
A number of federal agencies are experimenting with fascinating approaches to online public engagement, even in the absence of specific guidance about how they should approach such online opportunities.
They designed the event with the goal of sharing lessons from agencies that have some early experiences. The format was a series of short, five-minute, presentations, which I think worked well. Here are some insights I picked up:
Open Government Directive: Coming soon?
A large part of the motivation for the Playbook event was to get people engaged in discussing the Obama Administration’s Open Government Directive, which is expected to address how agencies should proceed on open data approaches and on online public engagement. The Directive was going to be released in October, but is not yet out; nobody at the Playbook event had much to say about the Directive, which was unsatisfying. There's a ton of interest in these strategies - so it cannot come too soon!
News about the Directive: InformationWeek – Sept 9
EPA
Presented a nice paradigm for modeling/planning citizen engagement:
from outreach
to information exchange
to developing recommendations collaboratively
to agreements
to stakeholder action
EPA has also apparently trained 60 people to be trainers in online collaboration. Impressive.
GSA
Some people asked questions about the role of GSA in establishing policy for federal agencies on open government issues. The answer given by one GSA staffer was, “no role.” That's too bad - given the part GSA has played in the past, e.g. in negotiating blanket agreements for the use of third party tools.
Tobi Edler presented GSA’s three-stage view of how to conduct public engagement online, which includes:
- Virtual town squares, i.e. idea jams. The White House has experimented with these several times. These are “software driven”, providing people a way to present ideas, review, comment and rank them.
- Virtual front porch: providing people ways to find and engage online with other people in their town/neighborhood, and then to take it offline to actually have in-person meetings.
- Electronic Petitions: to allow people to voice views on specific issues.
NIH Clinical Center
NIH has had some great experience with its "Drug Fact Chat Day," an annual day for teens to chat online with NIH experts. NIH provides this as a means for teens to obtain credible information from a trusted third party - and NIH gets some great intelligence about what is on the minds of teens (e.g., in 2009, there were twice as many questions related to marijuana as there were in 2008).
Drinking from the Firehose?
I heard genuine concerns from some federal staff (e.g., Forest Service) about the risk of being swamped by public input/comments online if they were to make rulemakings or decision-making proceedings more open for participation. Their concerns apparently stem from the obligation on agencies under the Administrative Procedures Act to catalog and reply to each individual comment (but is that not what the tool at Regulation.gov can help them with?).
I see opportunities for federal agencies to avoid injury from "drinking from the firehose" of public input online by defining differing levels of obligation for different levels of engagement...so they might indeed need to catalog and respond to comments in a rulemaking, but if they ask for more open-ended input about general policy issues, that should be valuable input which does not trigger response obligations.
Maxine Teller Maxine had some pragmatic suggestions from her work at DOD for agencies wanting to experiment and explore social media. She suggested that they need to accept that (a) they do need some policy/guidance to manage it, and (b) developing some new policy/guidance for social media is not impossible – it can be done!
Centers for Disease Control
Someone from CDC presented the organization's “2x10 Principles of Consequential Public Engagement (CPE),” which is "public engagement carried out in mutual learning situations in accordance with principles designed to assure serious consideration for any recommendations produced.” See the white paper by Roger H Bernier of CDC on this.
I list their 10 rules here – even though they do not (all) apply to the many situations in which governments might want to provide opportunities for public engagement online:
1. The desire for advice + the decision on the table are real.
2. Adequate time to deliberate + clarity of purpose are provided.
3. Both facts + values underlie the choices to be made.
4. Active agency staff + sufficient resources are committed to the process.
5. Both non-partisan citizens-at-large + partisan stakeholders participate.
6. A critical mass + diverse group of persons participate.
7. Unbiased information + neutral facilitation are provided.
8. Mutual learning through dialogue + thoughtful deliberation occur.
9. Difficult choices are made + agreed upon recommendations are produced.
10. The recommendations receive “serious consideration” + participants obtain candid feedback about the final decision made.
State Dept – Office of eDiplomacy
They are doing some great stuff, including experimenting with internal and inter-agency communities of interest on specific topics. The DipNotes blog is also a good and early example of government blogging.
State has established what seem to be some reasonable, limited rules for online collaboration:
"5 FAM 777 ONLINE COLLABORATION" (download as PDF.)
TSA
I like the tag line for the TSA blog - "Terrorists Evolve. Threats Evolve. Security Must Stay Ahead. You Play A Part." It is an active blog, with (moderated) comments, and they are using it in valuable ways. Just a few weeks ago there was a rumor circulating online that a woman (who is an active blogger) had been separated from her young child while going through TSA security. TSA reviewed their video of the station in question and saw that the claim was false, and jumped quickly to put the video online and to blog and tweet up a storm about the video. TSA got some 15k views of the video on CCTV, and, as of today, more than 120k of the clips up on YouTube. TSA feels they were able to nip this issue in the bud before it could cause a PR problem for them.
More about the Playbook Event
See Twitter on #opengovpb
The organizers plan to host such sessions every six to eight weeks - and will provide more info here.
Many of our clients at Forum One produce large numbers of PDF documents (reports, studies, policy briefs) which then are placed in a "documents" section on their web sites. The challenge these organizations face is then making these documents as widely accessed as possible.
One way to increase attention to documents is to use Scribd, a third-party document sharing site (or in shorthand, "YouTube for documents"). We have had good luck at Forum One using Scribd for our clients.
For example, one of our clients produced sixty well-crafted, arcane reports on medical technologies. The reports were getting about 11,000 "views" per year on the client's site. We put them on Scribd, where they quickly received about 50,000 "views" per year. It is difficult to precisely compare web site traffic to Scribd traffic because the notion of "view" may be different (on Scribd it can mean a quick visit to the document's description page). Nonetheless, at relatively little cost, the documents clearly got a lot of new attention.
There are three ways in which Scribd increases "views" of your documents. First, users of Scribd can find your documents through the site's internal search or "related documents" links. Second, Scribd documents generally come up higher in search engine results than documents on your site. Finally, Scribd documents can be easily embedded in third party web sites through the Scribd viewer. Happily, all of these extra views should be complementary to ongoing traffic on your web site.
In addition to increasing traffic, Scribd offers another service of relevance to many organizations. Documents can now be sold via the recently launched "Scribd Store". The store charges a 20% commission, a lower figure than competitors.
For all of its benefits, Scribd does have one drawback: how do you pronounce "Scribd"? (Answer according to Scribd staff: short i.)
So in short, we have found Scribd to be a useful service for organizations seeking increased attention to their documents. Scribd's core services are free, work well, and are worth a try.
Future post: Twitter.
Jim Cashel is Chairman at Forum One. Feel free to write him at cashel@ForumOne.com .
First came "Web 2.0" in which we (the people) got the power to publish, share, comment, friend, follow, tag, and organize online.
Then came "Gov 2.0" and the trumpets sounded for transparency of government data and innovation.
Now, Hope Street Group (a Forum One client) has opened up the policy making process with a new collaboration platform: Policy 2.0.
The concept is simple. The three steps are:
Recruit engaged citizens from outside of government -- most importantly the people directly impacted by the policy
Provide them with the tools to learn about, collaborate and refine real world policy recommendations
Give them a microphone and access to government leaders to advocate for and implement these recommendations
Hope Street Group pilot tested its Policy 2.0 model this past summer with a project to craft recommendations that improve teacher evaluation systems nationwide.
"Recommendations like this generally come from researchers and policymakers, administered top-down in states, districts, and eventually schools," according to Monique Nadeau, Executive Director of Hope Street Group. "But Hope Street Group recognizes that teacher and administrator input is critical in designing and implementing teacher evaluation systems, and this project really brought their voices to the table."
The pilot team comprised 22 K-12 educators, 6 private sector professionals, and 8 participants from the civil society sector across 17 states. They collaborated online on the Jive community platform, the recommendations were published in a report, and the results were presented at an October 26 event at the National Press Club.
What's most exciting about this platform is that it puts the power to craft real policy solutions in the hands of the engaged citizen, whether that citizen is a teacher who wants to have input in the policy that impacts his/her livelihood, or a community member motivated by a desire to improve a failing school district.
In the coming months, Hope Street Group and its Policy 2.0 community will be busy identifying targets and implementing its teacher evaluation recommendations in 10 or more districts, expanding its policy focus into health reform and looking to the public for the next great policy area to tackle.
Thousands of people woke up this morning seeking answers to these three questions:
How do I found out if I'm registered to vote?
Where do I vote?
What's on the ballot?
Many will turn to the internet for the answer and will find themselves at this polling place form on the Virginia State Board of Elections voter information web site. The form is clunky. It assumes you know your exact "locality." ("Do I live in Fairfax City or Fairfax County?"). Worse, it is the only place to find this official information.
Official voter information should be easily available in myriad web sites, search engines, and mobile phone applications. It should be presented in simple, attractive user interfaces. Unfortunately, the information is stored in a variety of dissimilar, muddy, closed formats. Every state stores this information differently.
Fortunately, a new partnership of state election officials, foundations, and technology companies are developing a better system. The project is led by the Pew Center on the States and Google.
The initiative is called the Voter Information Project. Their goal is to standardize official voting information into a common, XML standard. This will enable states to share this data widely with civic groups, political parties, and the media. Web programmers, in turn, can develop better voter web sites and applications.
The Virginia Voter Information Tool is a example of how good these tools can be once voter data is standardized and shared. Check it out. And if you live in Virginia, vote today! Polls close at 7 p.m.
This video introduces the Voter Information Project in plain English:
We recently described how we use social media at Forum One. Today we'll talk about the category leader for posting and sharing PowerPoint presentations, SlideShare.
Since we're a consulting firm, we (and many of our clients) produce a lot of PowerPoints. Some of them are not too bad. We've used SlideShare actively for the last three years posting our better efforts, as well as presentations from many of the events we host. The Forum One channel on SlideShare currently has 64 presentations.
The good news about SlideShare is that it is free, relatively easy to use (we'd give it a B+ for usability - some uploading is tricky), and seems to attract a lot of traffic. Our presentations have had about 90,000 views, with 5000 new views per month. This is more than they receive when posted on our own site. (A "view" means someone went at least to the landing page of the presentation, but didn't necessarily open it.) We assume that this attention is useful for propagating our firm's name and ideas.
The bad news is that we don't see SlideShare as a significant source of referral traffic to our web site. We're careful about including contact information in all of our presentations and on the presentation description pages, but despite our efforts we don't see much impact. About 30% of the traffic to our site is "direct" (that is, somebody already knows us and types in our URL), so it is possible that some of that is due to SlideShare.
Our overall conclusion is that for relatively little effort we can post presentations, refer to them in our daily correspondence which is useful, and (probably) benefit from their broader exposure on SlideShare.
Feel free to post your experience in comments below!
I want to tell you about a fantastic new (and developing) resource for congressional staff.
Back in September, Forum One was one of the sponsors of CongressCamp, an informal "barcamp" unconference here in Washington. For two days, attendees exchanged ideas on how social media and collaboration tools could increase citizen engagement with Capitol Hill.
As conversations came to a close, a session's focus turned toward creating something of lasting value. Hill communication folks are smart folks, but things are changing fast. Each Hill office typically has one person focused on social media. They depend on external advice and lack a single common resource for finding (and suggesting) the best tools and practices.
Even once the event ended, CongressCamp participants wished to help bridge the gap between citizen knowledge and congressional needs. They asked themselves, "How can we help Hill staff make their internet sites and services more useful for citizens?"
The result is the "Compass," a guide to online communications for Congressional offices.
Led by Wayne Moses Burke of the Open Forum Foundation, the Compass is just getting off the ground, and we could use your help. Hill staff are already using it and are anxious to receive feedback and expertise.
Wayne has created an open wiki that anyone can edit. Questions of interest to Congressional staff will be posted and answered. For example, we are currently authoring an article that answers the question: "What widgets are available to display social media content on a representative's website?"
I know we all have something to contribute. Get on over to the Compass and help improve Congress' ability connect with citizens!
This opportunity may be of interest to Influence followers or your colleagues:
The CSISCommission on Smart Global Health is seeking essay submissions that answer the following question in 500-800 words by midnight, November 20th 2009:
"What is the most important thing the U.S. can do to improve global health over the next 15 years?"
We are looking for fresh, innovative approaches to global health problems. The author of the winning essay will receive a $1,000 scholarship with a chance to be published in the Commission's final report. Read complete details on their website.
The CSIS Commission on Smart Global Health Policy focuses on practical solutions that maximize efficiency, produce measurable results, and engage the American public. This essay contest is one way we're expanding the conversation to include the ideas and opinions of people who are passionate about global health issues.
Tonight, (Tuesday, October 27) at 7 PM (EST), Bill and Melinda Gates will give a multimedia presentation to challenge the current problem-based global health narrative through illustration of success stories. The presentation is brought to us through the ONE Campaign Team.
I just RSVP'd to watch and get a special reminder email when the video and chat go live on Tuesday night. I thought others would like to check it out too:
The presentation will offer evidence that current U.S. investments in global health are working, and will demonstrate progress against global health challenges. Bill and Melinda will share their optimism that through sustained commitment to global health issues, the U.S. and its partners around the world have the potential to save and empower millions more lives.
Sounds very interesting, and I love the idea of tuning in to a live event with Bill and Melinda--so I thought I'd share.
So when it comes to designing our company's own social media strategy, it should be simple, right? While it's true we have a big head start, social media are changing so quickly, we need to strategize and experiment just like everyone else.
Here is how we currently are approaching social media as a company.
Goals
Before we are overwhelmed by countless opportunities in social media, we need to be very clear-headed: why are we doing this stuff? In our case we have four specific goals for our social media efforts:
1) Enhance our marketing efforts for consulting services, events, and products we sell such as ProjectSpaces;
2) Strengthen our ties with existing clients and colleagues;
3) Learn about social media, so we are in better position to advise others;
4) Increase Forum One's overall visibility.
All of our social media efforts need to tie clearly to one or more of these goals.
Channels
We currently manage 14 digital media channels at Forum One:
Web sites (five)
Blogs (five)
Newsletters (two)
Twitter (six accounts)
Electronic press releases
LinkedIn page
Facebook page
Scribd
Slideshare
Flickr
YouTube
Delicious
Events sites (eventbrite, upcoming)
Paid channels (Google, Facebook)
We periodically review each channel to evaluate if efforts are tying to our corporate goals, and to analyze costs / benefits. At this point our efforts are prioritized into three categories:
Receive high effort: Web, Blogs, Twitter, Newsletters
Receive some effort / appear to be useful: Press releases, Slideshare, Delicious, Event sites
Our corporate circumstances are different than many of our clients. We don't really use YouTube or Scribd internally, for example, but have had good luck with clients that produce lots of video or documents.
Metrics and Reporting
Social media offer great opportunities for gathering useful metrics. While it is hard to directly tie social media to outcomes (do our blogs really drive sales?), it is possible to watch outputs (posts, tweets, etc.) and actions (clicks, re-tweets, etc.). We have set up comprehensive social media reporting systems for a number of clients. We confess that internally we do something lighter weight than we typically advise others -- quarterly channel reviews to prioritize upcoming efforts, and quarterly performance tracking on a relatively small number of metrics which demonstrate reach.
In all of this it is necessary to experiment. At any one time we have a half dozen totally experimental new services underway (anyone else using Yammer, for example?). We also do what we can to learn from others in our own professional events and other events. Things are moving so quickly, other practitioners are really the only source of useful information. (The Online Community Research Network also provides this sort of information sharing.)
In the future, we'll be posting more detailed information about various channels, including those which seem to be performing best for us and our clients. We'd also love to hear any of your advice on this topic in the comments below.
It's that time again. Folks are getting excited about next year's Nonprofit Technology Conference in Atlanta. Last year, Forum One brought you great panels in user experience, data visualization, digital storytelling, and who could forget: Iron Chef!
This year, we have nominated a number of great new sessions. But they won't get selected unless people score them highly. Voting ends this Friday, October 16, so time is short. Our list of proposed panels is below. We'd love to hear what you think, and of course, we'd appreciate your vote!
Voting is easy and doesn't require registration. You just click the stars to vote. It will take you just a few minutes.
Creating a Culture of Storytelling
We know that storytelling is the most powerful way to get your organization's message out there, heard and remembered. We know that compelling stories inspire action and change. But how do you get your organization to commit to storytelling?
In this session -- a continuation of last year's "Better Online Storytelling" panel -- we'll explore successful, specific techniques to get your organization started finding and telling its best stories. From stories to emails, blogs to social media, you can create a culture of storytelling. Level: Intermediate. Leads: Roger Burks and Michaela Hackner.
This session will be the culmination of a webinar series leading up to the 2010 Nonprofit Technology Conference. During the session, participants from the webinar will share their experiences in getting buy-in from their organizations, collecting stories, packaging them and sharing them with the world.
These participants will read their stories to the group, share lessons learned and solicit feedback. We will also name the winner of the webinar series storytelling contest. Level: Beginner. Lead: Michaela Hackner and Roger Burks.
Do You Want Fries With That?: Adding Value to User Experience
Users' priorities aren't always our priorities. They come to our sites looking to "buy" one thing when we wish to "sell" them something else. How can we serve their needs while also engaging users with our missions? How can we create online products and services that will keep our constituents -- whether advocates, donors, or members -- coming to our site again and again? Level: Intermediate. Lead: Sophie Campagne.
Once again, your organization faces a short deadline and needs to come up with an application or campaign in record time. How can you do it? And more importantly, how can you do it well? We'll hear from several web managers who deployed a web site, internet application or interactive campaign in a few weeks from start to finish. Level: Intermediate. Lead: Michaela Hackner.
Set Your Data Free: How to Let OTHERS use YOUR data to make an impact
Data is sexy again, and setting it free with open API's, feeds, and open standards is transforming the way other people can use your data to help you make progress on your mission. This session will look at nonprofits that have choosen to let set their data free on the web, how they did it, and how it's helping their mission. Level: Intermediate. Lead: Kurt Voelker.
Online Community: Real World Lessons for Supporting Meaningful Constituent Engagement Online
To build or not to build (your own community features)? That is the question. When it comes to building engagement about your issue online, we all know that interaction and community matter. But how do you balance between building community on your site, and throughout the social web? What online community tactics work best? And most importantly, how have others tackled this problem and succeeded. Level: Intermediate. Lead: Kurt Voelker.
We're pleased to be partnering with ReadWriteWeb on an exciting conference this week - "The Real Time Web Summit". If you will be in the SF Bay area you should really think about going!
The real-time web is creating new opportunities in business, media, communication and collaboration. We are bringing together industry leaders using the real-time web in social networks, financial services, media and nonprofit groups to discuss:
* the state of the art, science and business of the real-time web
* efforts to create standards and interoperability
* challenges in user experience, technology and monetization.
The event will be an unconference format - leveraging users' interests to drive the sessions, and ensuring plenty of time for interactions.
REGISTRATION Click here, and enter discount code: forumone to save $50.
Forum One's Chief Community Officer Bill Johnston will be there and has also blogged about essential reading on the topic of the real-time web.
Influence covers innovations in communication, Internet technology and strategy to generate influence on important public policy issues. Chris Wolz manages this blog with the help of his colleagues at Forum One Communications, a web strategy/technology firm with offices in Washington DC, San Francisco and Seattle.