Its safe to say that we're all firm believers in open communications and collaborative tools. But organizations have some fear and trepidation in opening up and trying something perceived as risky. I think the main fear is rooted in "losing control" of a message, without understanding that your are actually part of a two-way conversation with your audience. And even if you choose not to participate, people will still go on talking about you. So, its refreshing for me to read how the American Cancer Society made the leap and has slowly changed to taken advantage of new tools to become more accesible and collaborative. Its noteworthy also in that this change was not mandated from the top, but evolved and spread throughout the ACS as its staff began internally using tools like flickr, del.icio.us, and blogs. Blogging played a key role in reaching out to supporters and keeping them engaged with ACS events. The whole post on Personal Democracy Forum is worth a read, and I'll pull out my favorite quote here to whet your appetite.
Unlike most traditional organizations, according to Erin, the senior staff of ACS ultimately decided that they "weren’t going to freak out about what people said about them." And since so much of the posting is done by volunteers, such as the event site on Flickr, ACS organizationally is not responsible for what gets posted. In other words, the more ACS lets go, the more successful the cancer community becomes by participating and owning their cause more.
The post also suggests that any organization can begin by scanning to see what people are saying about you. Are you doing that already? If not, why not?