There is huge potential in letting internet users help you to achieve your mission. Whether it is writing powerful software like Linux or delivering knowledge around the world like Wikipedia, the internet community has resources and skills to contribute. However, because you let people contribute doesn't mean you'll get what you want...
The most recent example of collaboration gone bad (well, at least from the sponsor's perspective) is
Chevy and The Apprentice marketing a new SUV by asking users to create commercials. Turns out that fancy prizes (a summer vacation, NASCAR races, and country music) weren't enough to keep all participants on message.
A lot of the contributions, some egged on by an anti-SUV environmental community, while creative, were probably not what Chevy and The Donald were looking for. Here's a few examples:
What lessons can we draw?
- It is hard to run a collaborative exercise without either careful moderation or carefully implemented community control.
- Users can tell when you are being too self-serving and prizes (even expensive ones) won't be enough to seduce all participants.
- This is a nice interface for a roll-your-own video tool. Discovery Education, are you watching?
Probably the most important lesson? -- It is darned hard to find a listing of the best spoof commercials. We clearly need someone to roll out a "rank the commercials" site quickly!